0:00
have you ever been in a negotiation
0:02
where it felt like neither side could
0:03
agree on anything and you didn't know
0:06
how to move forward negotiation doesn't
0:09
have to be a battle it can be a process
0:11
of finding solutions that work for
0:13
everyone the principles we'll discuss
0:16
today are from the Harvard negotiation
0:18
project and the book getting to yes by
0:20
Roger fiser and William Erie these
0:22
Timeless principles are used worldwide
0:25
in business project management and even
0:27
everyday life in this video we'll bring
0:30
break down the Harvard principles of
0:31
negotiation apply them to real world
0:34
project management scenarios and show
0:35
you how they can be just as useful in
0:37
your personal life stick around to the
0:39
end and you'll see how mastering these
0:41
principles can make you a better
0:42
negotiator both at work and at home
0:45
principle one separate the people from
0:48
the problem negotiations often fail
0:50
because emotions and personal conflicts
0:52
Cloud judgment and derail discussions
0:55
this principle encourages us to focus on
0:57
the problem itself rather than
0:59
attributing blame or targeting
1:01
individuals it's about maintaining a
1:03
clear distinction between relationships
1:06
and the issue at hand relationships
1:08
matter in negotiations and damaging them
1:11
can make future collaboration difficult
1:14
focusing on the problem allows both
1:17
sides to collaborate objectively
1:19
reducing defensiveness and hostility by
1:22
depersonalizing the issue you're
1:25
creating an environment where people can
1:27
openly discuss Solutions without feeling
1:30
attacked or alienated imagine a
1:33
disagreement between a team member and a
1:35
client about deliverables the client
1:37
might say your team isn't delivering
1:39
quality work which can feel like a
1:41
personal attack instead of reacting
1:44
defensively the project manager could
1:46
focus on the issue by saying let's take
1:48
a closer look at the deliverables and
1:50
discuss what changes would make them
1:52
align with your expectations this shifts
1:55
the conversation from blame to problem
1:57
solving making it easier to to reach a
2:00
solution principle two focus on
2:03
interests not positions positions are
2:06
the demands that people state in a
2:08
negotiation for example we need this
2:11
done in 2 weeks but underlying those
2:15
positions are interests the reasons or
2:18
motivations driving those
2:20
demands addressing interests rather than
2:23
positions opens the door to more
2:25
creative and mutually beneficial
2:27
solutions by understanding interests you
2:30
can find ways to satisfy those deeper
2:32
needs even if the initial demand isn't
2:35
entirely feasible this principle also
2:38
reduces the likelihood of stalemates as
2:40
it shifts the focus from rigid demands
2:43
to Shared goals let's say your client
2:45
Demands a project be completed 2 weeks
2:47
earlier than planned instead of focusing
2:50
solely on whether the deadline can be
2:52
met ask why the earlier delivery is
2:55
necessary you might learn that it aligns
2:57
with a product launch with this
2:59
information you can suggest a phased
3:01
delivery completing critical features
3:03
first to meet their need while giving
3:06
your team enough time for the remaining
3:07
tasks this approach addresses the
3:09
client's interest without overburdening
3:11
your team principle three generate
3:14
options for Mutual gain too often
3:17
negotiations narrow in on a single
3:19
solution too early limiting
3:21
opportunities for Creative problem
3:22
solving this principle emphasizes the
3:25
importance of brainstorming multiple
3:27
options before making a decision the
3:29
more possibilities you explore the
3:31
greater the likelihood of finding a
3:33
solution that benefits everyone
3:35
encouraging open dialogue and
3:37
collaboration Fosters trust and ensures
3:39
that all parties feel heard even if not
3:42
all options are feasible the process
3:44
itself can reveal Innovative approaches
3:46
that might not have been considered
3:48
otherwise imagine you're working with a
3:50
tight project budget and a stakeholder
3:52
wants additional features instead of
3:55
outright rejecting the request bring
3:57
your team together to brainstorm could
3:59
you repurpose existing resources could
4:02
less critical features be postponed to
4:04
make room for the new ones generating
4:06
options opens the door to Creative
4:08
Solutions that might not be obvious
4:11
initially principle four use objective
4:14
criteria subjective opinions can lead to
4:17
disagreements and make negotiations feel
4:19
arbitrary or unfair using objective
4:22
criteria such as data standards or
4:25
benchmarks ensures that discussions are
4:28
grounded in facts and measurable
4:30
outcomes this approach not only reduces
4:33
conflict but also builds credibility and
4:35
trust between parties objective criteria
4:39
act as a neutral guide for
4:40
decision-making they remove personal
4:42
biases and allow both sides to focus on
4:45
what's reasonable and fair based on
4:47
external standards let's say you're
4:49
negotiating rates with a contractor
4:51
instead of relying on personal opinions
4:53
about what's fair bring in market
4:56
research or past contracts to set
4:58
expectations for example based on
5:01
similar projects contractors in this
5:03
range typically charge between X and Y
5:06
let's discuss where your rates align
5:08
objective data creates a neutral ground
5:11
for discussions and minimizes
5:13
unnecessary back and forth let's look at
5:16
a comprehensive project management
5:18
scenario where these four principles
5:20
come into play let's say two departments
5:22
in your organization need access to the
5:25
same set of resources A specialized team
5:28
or equipment one Department argues that
5:30
their project has a higher priority
5:33
while the other insists that their
5:35
deadlines are tighter step one separate
5:38
the people from the problem start by
5:41
acknowledging everyone's frustration
5:42
without taking sides for example say I
5:45
understand that both teams are under
5:47
pressure to meet important goals let's
5:49
focus on how we can manage the resource
5:51
constraints to support both projects
5:54
effectively this approach calms emotions
5:56
and keeps the discussion professional
5:59
step two two focus on interests not
6:02
positions instead of getting stuck in
6:04
who deserves the resources uncover the
6:07
underlying interests one Department
6:09
might need the resources to meet a
6:11
client's delivery date while the other
6:13
may require them to maintain quality
6:16
standards understanding these interests
6:18
helps frame the discussion around Mutual
6:20
success rather than competition step
6:23
three generate options for Mutual gain
6:27
bring both teams together to brain Storm
6:29
Solutions could the resources be shared
6:32
during off peak times could one team
6:35
temporarily adjust its schedule to
6:37
prioritize the other or could additional
6:39
resources be brought in to support both
6:42
projects generating options ensure that
6:45
every possibility is explored step four
6:48
use objective criteria finally guide the
6:52
decision using data such as workload
6:54
metrics client commitments or financial
6:57
impact for example if one project has a
7:00
tighter deadline that directly affects
7:03
Revenue it might take precedence by
7:06
relying on measurable factors you make
7:08
the decision process fair and
7:10
transparent these principles aren't just
7:13
for project managers they're invaluable
7:15
in daily life imagine negotiating chores
7:18
or screen time with family members
7:20
discussing rent terms with a landlord or
7:23
buying a car by focusing on shared
7:25
interests and using objective criteria
7:28
you can turn potentially stressful
7:30
situations into collaborative
7:32
discussions the Harvard principles of
7:34
negotiation provide a powerful framework
7:37
for navigating conflicts and finding
7:39
solutions that work for everyone by
7:42
separating people from the problem
7:43
focusing on interests generating options
7:46
and using objective criteria you can
7:49
transform how you approach negotiations
7:52
and it's not just about advancing your
7:54
career these principles make you a
7:56
better communicator and Problem Solver
7:58
in everyday life where whether you're
7:59
working with colleagues family members
8:02
or even strangers if you found this
8:04
video helpful please give it a thumbs up
8:06
your support helps us create more
8:08
valuable content don't forget to
8:09
subscribe and visit pmas sprint.com for
8:12
more insights into project management
8:15
finally I'd love to hear from you which
8:17
of these principles resonates with you
8:19
the most and how do you plan to apply it
8:21
share your thoughts in the comments
8:23
below thanks for watching and I'll see
8:25
you in the next video