What should the Project Manager do?

Last Updated on May 31, 2026 by andrewshih

If you have been studying for the PMP exam, you have probably encountered scenario-based questions like:

  • What should the project manager do?
  • What should the project manager do next?
  • What should the project manager do first?

These questions are some of the most common — and most frustrating — question types on the PMP exam.

The difficulty is not that the answers are completely wrong. In fact, several answers often sound reasonable.

The real challenge is understanding:

What is the correct action at this moment in the process?

That is exactly what PMI is testing.

Some students approach these questions with oversimplified rules such as:

  • “What should the PM do next?” always means analyze.
  • “What should the PM do?” means take action.

Unfortunately, both assumptions can lead to wrong answers.

Some students become too passive and overanalyze, while others jump into corrective action before fully understanding the situation.

The PMP exam rewards project managers who understand the proper decision sequence.

Strong project managers do not simply react. They:

  1. Understand the situation
  2. Evaluate the impact and options
  3. Then take action

This article will help you understand how to approach “What should the project manager do?” questions using a structured PMP mindset.


Why “What Should the Project Manager Do?” Questions Are Difficult

One of the biggest reasons students struggle with these questions is that multiple answers often sound technically correct.

For example:

A stakeholder raises a concern about delays. Possible answers may include:

  • Review the schedule
  • Meet with the stakeholder
  • Submit a change request
  • Compress the schedule

Several of these actions may eventually happen during the project.

However, only one answer represents the correct next step based on the information currently available.

That is the key insight.

The PMP exam tests not only whether you know project management concepts. It is testing whether you understand:

  • sequencing,
  • timing,
  • process flow,
  • stakeholder engagement,
  • and decision logic.

In many cases, the correct answer is not the “best solution.” It is the correct action for that specific stage of the situation.


The Fundamental PMP Decision-Making Principle

The easiest way to approach these questions is to remember this sequence:

PMP Decision SequencePurpose
UnderstandGather information and clarify the situation
EvaluateAnalyze impact, root cause, and options
ActImplement the appropriate response

Before taking action, the project manager usually needs enough information to make an informed decision.

However, once the root cause and impact are already known, continuing to analyze becomes unnecessary.

The exam rewards appropriate timing.

Many incorrect answers fail because they:

  • Act too early,
  • Escalate too quickly,
  • Skip stakeholder engagement,
  • Continue analyzing after sufficient information already exists.

Simple Decision Framework for PMP Questions

When reading scenario-based questions, ask yourself these three questions:

1. Do I fully understand the situation?

If the answer is no, the correct response is usually:

  • Gather more information
  • Analyze
  • Assess
  • Review
  • Investigate

2. Has the impact or root cause been evaluated?

If not, the project manager typically needs to:

  • Engage stakeholders
  • Perform impact analysis
  • Conduct root cause analysis
  • Review project artifacts

3. Is there enough information to act confidently?

If yes, then the correct response may involve:

  • Implementing corrective action
  • Executing the response plan
  • Escalating according to governance
  • Updating the backlog or change request

This framework helps you determine where you are in the decision sequence.

Now, let’s look at four common scenarios.


Scenario Type #1: The Problem Just Occurred

One of the most common PMP scenarios involves a newly identified problem.

You may see question wording such as:

  • A delay has occurred
  • A defect was discovered
  • A stakeholder raised a concern
  • A team member identified an issue
  • A vendor missed a deadline

At this stage, something has gone wrong. However, the project manager usually has limited information.

This is where many students make their first mistake.

They immediately jump into solutions such as:

  • Implement corrective action
  • Crash the schedule
  • Escalate the issue
  • Replace the vendor

But the PMP mindset expects the project manager to first understand the situation before taking action.

Correct PMP Approach

At this stage, the correct answer is often:

  • Review the issue
  • Assess the impact
  • Analyze the situation
  • Gather additional information
  • Meet with relevant stakeholders

The project manager needs enough information to determine:

  • What happened?
  • Why it happened?
  • Who is impacted?
  • What options are available?

Common PMP Trap

A very common incorrect answer is immediate corrective action before sufficient analysis. The PMP exam generally discourages impulsive decision-making. Strong project managers avoid solving the wrong problem.


Scenario Type #2: Is the Root Cause Known or Unknown?

This is one of the most important distinctions on the PMP exam. Many students confuse symptoms with root causes.

For example:

  • A dependency was missed
  • A deliverable was delayed
  • A defect occurred during testing

These statements describe what happened. They do not necessarily explain why it happened.

The underlying cause could still be unknown.

Possible root causes may include:

  • Poor communication,
  • Inadequate planning,
  • Unclear requirements,
  • Lack of stakeholder engagement,
  • Insufficient training.

If the Root Cause Is Unknown

The project manager is still in the analysis phase.

Correct responses usually involve:

  • Performing root cause analysis
  • Reviewing project artifacts
  • Analyzing the issue
  • Gathering additional information

If the Root Cause Is Clearly Identified

Once the question explicitly states the root cause, the situation changes.

For example:

  • The delay occurred because the required resources were unavailable
  • The defect was caused by incorrect requirements
  • The issue resulted from a known process gap

Now the project manager already understands why the issue occurred.

At this point, continuing to analyze is usually unnecessary.

The correct response often becomes:

  • Implement corrective action
  • Resolve the issue
  • Update the plan
  • Apply the agreed response strategy

If the Problem Keeps Happening

If the issue repeatedly occurs and the cause is already known, the project manager is expected to think beyond corrective action.

The focus shifts toward:

  • Continuous improvement,
  • Process enhancement,
  • Preventive action,
  • Long-term stability.

Simple Rule to Remember

SituationTypical PMP Response
You only know what happenedAnalyze
You know why it happenedAct
The issue keeps happeningImprove the system

This is one of the most useful frameworks for PMP situational questions.


Scenario Type #3: A Change Is Introduced

Change-related questions are extremely common on the PMP exam.

Typical scenarios include:

  • A stakeholder requests a new feature
  • A client wants to modify scope
  • A sponsor requests additional reporting
  • A regulatory change impacts requirements

The correct answer often depends on the project environment.


Predictive vs Agile Decision Logic

One of the most important PMP mindset distinctions is understanding how change is handled differently in predictive and agile environments.

Predictive Environment

In predictive projects, scope is usually baselined. Changes are controlled through formal change management processes.

The project manager should:

  1. Assess the impact
  2. Analyze effects on scope, schedule, cost, and resources
  3. Submit a change request
  4. Follow the formal change control process

Agile Environment

In agile environments, scope is more flexible. Changes are commonly managed through the product backlog.

The project manager or agile team typically:

  1. Adds the request to the backlog
  2. Prioritizes it with the Product Owner
  3. Evaluates it during backlog refinement or iteration planning

The team generally avoids disrupting the current sprint unless the issue is critical.


Change Management Decision Table

Project EnvironmentTypical PMP Response
PredictiveFollow formal change control
AgileAdd to backlog and reprioritize
HybridFollow the agreed governance process

Common PMP Trap in Change Questions

One of the most common incorrect answers is:

“Implement the change immediately.”

The PMP mindset generally discourages bypassing governance and evaluation.

Before implementing change, the project manager usually needs to:

  • Evaluate impact,
  • Engage stakeholders,
  • Follow the appropriate process.

Scenario Type #4: Stakeholder or Team Issues

Another major category of PMP situational questions involves people dynamics.

Examples include:

  • Conflict between team members
  • A disengaged stakeholder
  • Misalignment between departments
  • Communication breakdowns
  • Resistance to change

In these situations, many students immediately choose solution-oriented answers such as:

  • Resolve the conflict
  • Replace the team member
  • Escalate to management
  • Force a decision

However, the PMP mindset usually expects engagement before enforcement.

Correct PMP Approach

The project manager should first:

  • Communicate,
  • Facilitate discussion,
  • Understand stakeholder concerns,
  • Align expectations.

For example, if two team members are in conflict, the first step is usually not to impose a solution.

Instead, the project manager should:

  • facilitate collaboration,
  • understand both perspectives,
  • and help the team reach alignment.

Key PMP Principle

Do not impose solutions before understanding the underlying people dynamics.

Strong project managers do not only solve visible problems. They first understand what is driving the behavior.


Common Mistakes PMP Students Make

1. Acting Too Early

Students often choose action before fully understanding the situation.

Examples:

  • Escalating immediately
  • Removing a team member
  • Implementing corrective action too soon

2. Over-Analyzing

Other students remain stuck in analysis even after the root cause is already known.

Once sufficient information exists, the PMP mindset expects the project manager to move forward.


3. Ignoring the Project Environment

The correct answer may differ significantly between:

  • Predictive
  • Agile
  • Hybrid environments

Always identify the development approach before selecting an answer.


4. Ignoring Stakeholder Engagement

The PMP exam strongly emphasizes collaboration and communication.

Project managers are expected to:

  • Engage stakeholders,
  • Facilitate alignment,
  • Encourage collaboration before imposing solutions.

PMP Mindset: The Exam Is Testing Timing

One of the biggest mindset shifts for the PMP exam is understanding that PMI often tests timing rather than technical knowledge.

Two answers may both be technically correct.

The difference is:

  • One answer represents the correct action now
  • While the other represents an action that may happen later

That is why understanding sequencing is critical.

Strong project managers do not simply react. They:

  1. Understand the situation
  2. Evaluate impact and options
  3. Then take action

This pattern appears repeatedly across:

  • Risk management
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Quality management
  • Conflict resolution
  • Change management
  • Issue resolution

Final Thoughts

The question “What should the project manager do?” is testing whether you understand:

  • Process flow,
  • Timing,
  • Stakeholder engagement,
  • Governance,
  • Situational decision-making.

The most important principle to remember is:

Understand → Evaluate → Act

Before choosing an answer, pause and ask yourself:

  • Do I fully understand the situation?
  • Is the root cause known?
  • Has the impact been evaluated?
  • Is there enough information to act?

That simple framework can dramatically improve your performance on PMP situational questions.

10 Practice Questions

Here are ten practice questions to help reinforce the learning. To view the answer, use the arrow on the right side of each question to display the answer.

Question #1
An agile team is developing a mobile application. During a sprint review, stakeholders say that a recently completed feature works as described, but it does not provide the expected business value. The product owner agrees that the feature was prioritized using outdated assumptions about customer behavior.
What should the project manager do?

A. Ask the team to revise the completed feature during the next sprint so it delivers the value stakeholders expected.
B. Facilitate a discussion with the product owner and stakeholders to review the feedback and adjust the product backlog priorities.
C. Update the definition of done to include validation of business value before a feature can be accepted.
D. Recommend that the product owner conduct additional customer research before approving any future sprint backlog.

Question #2
A project manager is leading a hybrid project to implement a new vendor management system. The contract configuration is being managed predictively, while the user portal is being delivered in iterations. During a sprint planning session, the product owner selects several high-value portal features for the next sprint. Later that day, the procurement lead informs the project manager that a contract approval milestone has slipped, and the portal team may not have access to the required vendor data during the sprint.
What should the project manager do?

A. Update the issue log and ask the procurement lead to provide a revised contract approval date before the sprint begins.
B. Collaborate with the product owner to replace the affected portal features with backlog items that do not depend on vendor data.
C. Bring the procurement lead, product owner, and delivery team together to assess the dependency and decide how to adjust the sprint plan.
D. Submit a change request to revise the project schedule and communicate the contract milestone delay to stakeholders.

Question #3
A project manager is leading a predictive project to implement a new customer portal. During a weekly status meeting, a business stakeholder states that a recently launched competitor feature may make one of the planned portal functions less valuable. The stakeholder asks the project manager to replace that function with a new capability before development begins next week.
What should the project manager do next?

A. Ask the development team to replace the planned function with the new capability to maintain business value.
B. Review the stakeholder’s request, assess the impact on scope, schedule, cost, and risks, and follow the formal change control process.
C. Inform the stakeholder that the scope has already been approved and the requested change cannot be considered.
D. Escalate the request to the sponsor and ask the sponsor to decide whether the team should implement the new capability.

Question #4
A project manager is leading a hybrid project to replace a legacy claims-processing system. The infrastructure work is being managed predictively, while the user-facing features are being delivered incrementally by an agile team. During a sprint review, operations stakeholders say several delivered features meet the documented acceptance criteria but do not support the way claims are actually processed. The product owner explains that the backlog was prioritized using assumptions from senior leadership because operations representatives were not consistently available during backlog refinement.
What should the project manager do?

A. Ask the product owner to compare the delivered features against the original business objectives and determine whether the next sprint should focus on correcting the workflow gaps.
B. Facilitate a working session with the product owner and operations stakeholders to clarify the workflow gaps and determine how the backlog should be refined and reprioritized.
C. Update the stakeholder engagement plan to require operations representatives to attend future sprint reviews and backlog refinement sessions.
D. Review the acceptance criteria with the agile team and product owner to determine whether the delivered features should be accepted as completed work.

Question #5
A project team has missed two consecutive iteration goals. During the retrospective, the team says the same external dependency keeps delaying their work. The issue was mentioned in the previous retrospective, but no follow-up action was taken.
What should the project manager do?

A. Meet individually with team members to understand why the dependency issue was not investigated after the previous retrospective.
B. Ask the product owner to reorder the backlog so the team can select work with fewer external dependencies in the next iteration.
C. Work with the team to analyze the recurring dependency issue, identify the root cause, and agree on actions to prevent it from impacting future iterations.
D. Add the dependency as an impediment in the team’s improvement backlog and review it during the next retrospective.

Question #6
A project manager is leading a hybrid project. The infrastructure work is following a predictive schedule, while the application features are being delivered in iterations. Midway through the project, the infrastructure team reports that a key environment will not be ready for the next iteration as planned. The agile team says this may block several high-priority backlog items.
What should the project manager do next?

A. Collaborate with the product owner to replace the blocked backlog items with lower-priority work that does not depend on the environment.
B. Update the project schedule to reflect the infrastructure delay and notify stakeholders of the expected impact.
C. Bring the infrastructure lead, product owner, and agile team together to assess the dependency impact and determine the best response.
D. Meet with the infrastructure team to understand why the environment will not be ready and ask them to identify recovery options.

Question #7
A project manager is leading a predictive project to deploy new compliance reporting software. A regulatory stakeholder informs the project manager that a recently issued reporting requirement may apply to the project. The stakeholder believes the requirement could affect one of the deliverables scheduled for completion next month, but the legal team is already reviewing whether the requirement applies.
What should the project manager do?

A. Submit a change request to add the new reporting requirement to the project scope before the deliverable is completed.
B. Ask the project team to begin updating the deliverable so the project is prepared if the requirement is confirmed.
C. Update the risk register and monitor the regulatory requirement until the legal team completes its review.
D. Work with the regulatory stakeholder and legal team to assess the impact of the requirement and prepare a change request for approval.

Question #8
A predictive project has experienced repeated delays in completing design reviews. The project manager worked with the team to investigate the issue and confirmed that review packages were being submitted without all required inputs. The team agreed that a checklist validation step must be completed before any package is sent for review. The next design review cycle is about to begin.
What should the project manager do?

A. Conduct another root cause analysis to determine why review packages were incomplete in previous cycles.
B. Meet with the design reviewers to confirm whether incomplete packages caused the prior delays.
C. Implement the agreed checklist validation step before review packages are submitted.
D. Update the lessons learned register with the design review delays and the agreed response.

Question #9
A predictive project has experienced repeated delays in completing design reviews. The project manager previously worked with the team to investigate the issue and found that review packages were often incomplete because the design checklist was unclear. The team updated the checklist, but the same issue has occurred again in the current review cycle.
What should the project manager do?

A. Reassess the review process with the team to determine why the updated checklist did not prevent incomplete submissions.
B. Ask the design reviewers to provide additional examples of missing information so the checklist can be clarified further.
C. Require the team lead to verify each review package against the checklist before it is submitted for design review.
D. Record the recurring delay as a quality issue and include the trend in the next project performance report.

Question #10
A project manager is leading a hybrid project to launch a new customer onboarding platform. The platform features are being delivered in iterations, while data migration is following a predictive plan. During an iteration review, stakeholders approve the new onboarding workflow. Two days later, the data migration lead reports that several required customer fields are not available in the legacy system, which may prevent the approved workflow from being used as designed.
What should the project manager do next?

A. Update the issue log with the missing data fields and reevaluate the data migration workstream.
B. Work with the data migration lead, product owner, and team to assess the impact of the missing fields on the approved workflow and release plan.
C. Update the risk register with the data availability issue and continue monitoring the migration workstream.
D. Submit a change request to revise the approved onboarding workflow so it aligns with the available legacy system data.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments